Against copyright

Schermafbeelding 2019-05-25 om 10.35.01

Recently, in the gym, I heard a song by Enrique Iglesias. An old classic, I don’t know the name, but the chorus goes ‘you can run, you can hide, but you can’t escape my love.’ This made me think: how funny would it be to make a video parody where a beta sings those lyrics, totally creeping out the woman he sings it to, probably stalks her or something. You know, exact same lyrics that turn women on when sung by high status man, but when a sung by a low status man, suddenly horrible. Good stuff.

Then I thought to myself: not a chance it’s gonna happen. Apparently, the copyright police has become so tyrannical, that by this point you cannot even hum a song in a youtube video without risking it being copyrighted. Talk about stupid greed.

Now people will say: ‘yes perhaps that is stupid, but there should be some kind of law to protect artists from other people using their content without permission.’ I disagree: there should be no such law. Let people re-use other people’s content without permission. Hell, copy-pasta my stuff all you want, if you really want to you can even pass it off as your own and turn a buck on my blood sweat and words. I don’t care.

The thing is, and this becomes really obvious on the internet, that artists gain traction because people spread around their content. Will I be sued for using an image of Pepe? No I won’t, so I can safely spread images of Pepe. Whereas I cannot even hum a song of Enrique Iglesias, so I will not be spreading songs of Enrique Iglesias. To expect otherwise, i.e. that people will continue spreading your stuff when you actively undermine them in doing so, it is just plain self-defeating greed.

I guess Metallica were among the first of major artists publicly consumed by greed when they sued Napster. The truth of course, is that Metallica should’ve sent a personal thank-you note to Napster for spreading their music. The only reason I even know a decent amount of Metallica songs is because I can listen to them for free. Metallica, you’re good, but you’re not that good. No artist is that good. What is going on is a fundamental feeling of insecurity: ‘I am missing out on revenue when people pirate my stuff.’ Nah man, when people are spreading your memes, it is free advertisement. Of all the people showing up at your concert, how many have actually bought your album versus how many have listened to your pirated music? Pretty sure the ratio tilts to the latter.

Now, the greed of individual content creators didn’t need to be a major problem, but unfortunately we live in a decaying prog society, where, if the state can screw us over, it will screw us over. Since there’s censorship to be made in copyright claims, of course the state was going to get involved. Ostensibly under the name of ‘protecting the artists’ but pretty obviously in actuality to extort and to censor. No one asked for the EU to regulate memes. Absolutely no one. But it happened anyway.

Whenever the state sticks its nose in business not absolutely necessary to stick its nose in, things tend to go very badly, because in the absence of being able to do even tiniest amount of good, only bad eggs stick around. Copyright laws are not absolutely necessary, not even necessary, even counterproductive, hence all the state-involved parties are bad eggs

As for content creators: when you excise copyright power on your own memes, you kill them. People are gonna steal and copy your stuff, but this is a compliment, since standard procedure is that people ignore your stuff. The more your stuff is stolen, the more it spreads, and the more it spreads, the more people will be inclined to actually buy your stuff.

14 thoughts on “Against copyright

  1. There was actually a stand-up comedian who made this exact joke about 10 years ago, although it was just a short bit, not a whole video parody. Wasn’t just humming though, he actually sang the words in a very fake beaner accent.

    Also, the cuck creator of Pepe actually did start suing people and trying to kill the meme. But I think that’s kind of the point. No way the guy himself thought he was somehow being taken advantage of, there was just a team of lawyers somewhere who thought THEY might be able to make a buck, and maybe subtly hinted to him that he’d be tarred as a superNazi for not backing the suit.

    Runaway holiness spiral + the world’s worst profession = why we can’t have nice things.

    1. Nice. The closest I can find on youtube is this. I like how they called it the ‘official’ parody, as opposed to all these other unofficial parodies.

  2. I used to be a Misesian and I still hold their anti-copyright stance. Copying is not stealing, people who say so cannot speak accounting, and people who cannot speak accounting should not talk about economics any more than people who cannot speak math should talk about physics. Stealing is an enforced cost – the inventory from the balance sheet is written off to a cost account. Copying is lost sales – but not even a 100% sure lost sales, as it is not sure one would have bought it otherwise. People have a natural right to choose their costs, but not their sales. That is for the customers to choose.

    Practically speaking, the clothing industry is one big exception. No copyright, just trademark. That is, everybody is free to copy the latest Levi’s jeans as long as they don’t put a Levi’s label on it. Result? The clothing and fashion industry is not in any financial duress. In fact, while poor people 100 years ago were hungry, ill, and cold, they are not cold anymore because the world has such an abundance of freely donated clothing that nobody needs to go cold anymore.

    Finally, what would happen if arts like music had no copyright? It would be much harder to make the average chum pay for it. It means the artists would be living off the patronage of the rich, like in the past they did. Would that make music better? Well 15 years ago I would have said clearly yes. Not so sure anymore. Crappy pop would disappear. But maybe so would metal. I am kinda afraid what we would have is faggy-artsy whining about how life is hard as a trans. After all, our “aristocrats” are Harvard… I don’t know. The rich people I actually know are most into classical rock or jazz. But that is because the rich people I actually know are old and not very educated. Although that one guy I know, who owns a factory and is very educated engineer, actually plays in a hobby jazz band.

    1. The best music I listen to has little to no copyright enforcement either because it’s too old for copyright to be enforced, or because its maker is not a big enough player to have a team of lawyers enforce copyright.

  3. What’s hilarious is this is ALL stemming from y’all not getting what you want. Everything is built on top of that. People are against you, they’re “tyrannical,” they’re just out to make a buck, they’re lying, they’re blah blah blah.

    But if you got what you wanted from them, you’d say they’re great people.

    It’s all about how you didn’t get what you wanted. You can work hard for what you want, but all the whining when you don’t is so childish.

          1. Just using your word. I doubt anything is broken, but I haven’t updated in a couple years. I have influence offline. I don’t need to beg strangers on the Internet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.