Wrath of the incels

So I hear Alek Minassian, the Toronto driver killing 10 people, was an incel (= involuntary celibate). This greatly puzzles normies. How can a 25-year old man have so much hatred just because he doesn’t get laid?

It is important to note that this is not the first time such a thing has happened. Four years ago Elliot Rodger went on a similar rampage, although not before he uploaded a final message to the internet:

Now you might say: ‘holy shit Alf, mountains of skulls and rivers of blood? He was in a pretty dark place.’ Yes he was. But in between his blood rage revenge fantasy he makes a valid point: it isn’t fair.

Men who receive positive female attention don’t realize how hard it is to be an utter reject. Sex is a big deal. If you are not getting any, not even a kiss, if woman scold you, ignore you, laugh at you, hell yes you are going to be bitter! Especially if you see those same woman slutting themselves out to assholes. It isn’t fair.

At which point the normie interjects: ‘well, life isn’t fair! I never got anything handed to me either! Better just shape up, face it like a man.’ With which I agree, up to a point. Indeed, if an incel doesn’t lift iron at least 2 times a week, he isn’t really trying.

But the incel isn’t really saying that life is unfair. The incel is saying: it’s not just unfair, it is made to be unfair.

The difference is important. Take a game of soccer. Real Madrid (good club) versus Roda JC (bad club). Real Madrid wins 16 – 0. The normie says: ‘of course Real Madrid wins, they have the better players!’ But that’s not what the incel is saying. The incel is saying: ‘perhaps, but the referee is constantly whistling in favor of Real Madrid!’

Similarly, the deck is stacked against low status men. Following emancipation, women have free sexual choice, and with great joy use that freedom to completely ignore loser men. The men on the low end of the sexual market are literally invisible to women and the moment they dare say something of it, women sternly put them back in their place.

Such continual rejection hits a man right in his balls. It’s a soul-crushing rejection: you are not man enough for society. And society encourages this behavior. Society says: it is deeply empowering of girls to reject loser incels, also it is deeply disturbing that incels think they are entitled to sex.

Normies, being as egotistical as anyone, have trouble wrapping their minds around this point. In their minds society is an innocent bystander. Nonsense. Society determines male status, and if society lowers male status, the males already on the lower end of the ladder feel it the heaviest. Spandrell argued that this is why Islam is so successful: Islam raises the status of men. The downgrade in status that drives Muslim males to terrorism in the West is the same that drove Alek Minassian to kill pedestrians, that 4 years ago drove Elliot Rodger to kill 6 people.

It used to be more fair, in that the referee whistled equally for Real as for Roda. Used to be so that it was not done for a teenage girl to slut around, used to be so her dad would make her date a decent guy, they’d secretly have sex before marriage, openly have sex after marriage. Christian enforced monogamy meant every guy had a shot at getting a girl.

Not so much anymore. Nowadays the sexual market is a war zone. If you’re not a 6 foot tall obnoxious brute with veiny muscles, a neck tattoo and a feather on your hat you’re already 3 points behind¹. There’s a few winners that take it all, but there’s many more losers that take little or nothing.

Elliot asks: ‘why are women not attracted to me?’ Besides lifting iron and taking care of your appearance, there is one thing that greatly increases your chances to get laid: game. But guys like Elliot and Alek always respond the same to game:

I guess that makes me a very bad person. Why do we seem like very bad people?

The problem is that while incels reject certain parts of modern society, they do not reject fundamental myths of modern society such as the myth that women are virtuous and angelic. Elliot Rodger simultaneously saw women as angels and whores. He couldn’t reconcile those positions because listening to men who know the secrets of women attacked the notion that women are angels and Elliot did not want to let that myth go.

I empathize with that. It is very difficult to get to the heart of women because you need to ignore what almost everyone around you says. Swallowing the red pill is tough, because from a blue pill mindset it so closely resembles a black pill. When I started out with game, though not as an incel, friends and family told me I was just being hateful towards women. Then, when I started having success, these people told me I was only banging easy sluts. Then, when I started dating pretty virgin girls these people said more hateful stuff, although I do not know what they said exactly because by this point I had cut them out of my life.

What I’m saying is, it’s hard to swallow the red pill if everyone around you tells you the red pill is evil. Much, much easier to make society as a whole swallow the red pill, so that pretty girls are no longer considered angels when they bang Jeremy Meeks, so that Alek Minassian would have been set-up with a nice woman from his neighborhood. As was custom for thousands of years.

The wrath of the incels is the entirely predictable consequence of the destruction of patriarchy.

 

 


¹ Soccer points of course.

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Wrath of the incels

  1. I think the west is poised for a mass conversion to Islam. It looks like everything is primed for it. The elites, the media, female hypergamy, incel rage, mass immigration of Alpha muslims instead of beta Hindus. Oh well, as houllebecq says, as has happened so many times in the past, the second Abrahamism prepares the way for the third.

    Judaism to resist, Christianity to subvert and Islam to conquer. Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

    1. Don’t think so.

      Islam might fit white women, it don’t fit white males. Islam means submission to brown males and I think the white man has too much pride. Instead we will just see chaos and war.

      My white pill would be that the west converts to Jimianity: keep all the good stuff of Christianity, throw in Darwin and the red pill.

      1. One huge setback will cause pride to vanish faster than a snowball in a furnace. Pride has causes, in this case the achievements of western civilization. Take away the cause, the effect vanishes.

        For Jimianity to be a thing, there has to be someone among the power elite who is sympathetic to Jim’s views. I just don’t see anyone, any entity currently among the elite that might be sympathetic to such views. The White man once had too much pride to submit to White woman. Just look around and see what has happened.

        What might happen is that Whites convert to White Islam, somewhat like the Ottoman Turks which does not necessarily require a submission to Brown Arab men. A White figure might arise, might even proclaim himself the Mahdi and might offer a ” true” interpretation of Muhammad’s revelations, declaring all other interpretations to be heresy. We might end up with a third great sect of Islam, White Islam, to complement the Shia and Sunni versions. In fact the Shia and Sunni versions might even merge to counter white Islam. The Fundamental doctrine of White Islam might be that Prophet Muhammad was actually a Blue-eyed, Blonde Nordic which is why the Arabs do not like to show any pictures of him. Anyone who disagrees that the Prophet Muhammad was actually a Blonde, Blue eyed Nordic is either committing Blasphemy or is a Kuffar against whom Jehad must be waged. This, I can see happening, if the Neo-Nazi conversions to Islam are anything to go by. Your great friend, Spandrell, infact endorses a similar event. The resultant ideology will permit whites to ruthlessly slaughter traitors in their midst (Kuffars) and drive out the Arabs (Heretics).

  2. There won’t be a massive conversions of White people to Islam. Roman Christianity conquered Rome because it was mixed with Classical Values (even in the beginning of the Gospel of John and even more with the Church Fathers). Islam is a different paradigm than Rome/Western Civilization and it is mature enough not to change radically.But Islam may be able to conquer Western civilization by war and demography.

    1. This is what you see in my homeland. Western people becoming more and more degenerate while Muslim are more and more abundant. The way barbarians conquered decadent Rome, Muslim can conquer the decadent West.

      With one difference, barbarians were pagans so they adopted the Christian monotheism. Muslim have a monotheism on their own so it is difficult for them to convert to Christianity. So it will be something like in Al-Andalus, the conquering of a territory and the ruling of Muslim values.

      1. Yes but it’s further away than dissident rightists believe. They have better-looking demographics, but in the West they don’t have the institutions.

        1. Unless the West abandons Democracy, Muslims will get these institutions. London already has a Muslim mayor.

  3. “There are two kinds of men in this world, Blondie: those who have seen and comprehended the gaping vagina dentata of the female hindbrain, and those cherubic terminal adolescents who can never accept what Mother Nature has wrought.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.