Monthly Archives: April 2018

Wrath of the incels

So I hear Alek Minassian, the Toronto driver killing 10 people, was an incel (= involuntary celibate). This greatly puzzles normies. How can a 25-year old man have so much hatred just because he doesn’t get laid?

It is important to note that this is not the first time such a thing has happened. Four years ago Elliot Rodger went on a similar rampage, although not before he uploaded a final message to the internet:

Now you might say: ‘holy shit Alf, mountains of skulls and rivers of blood? He was in a pretty dark place.’ Yes he was. But in between his blood rage revenge fantasy he makes a valid point: it isn’t fair.

Men who receive positive female attention don’t realize how hard it is to be an utter reject. Sex is a big deal. If you are not getting any, not even a kiss, if woman scold you, ignore you, laugh at you, hell yes you are going to be bitter! Especially if you see those same woman slutting themselves out to assholes. It isn’t fair.

At which point the normie interjects: ‘well, life isn’t fair! I never got anything handed to me either! Better just shape up, face it like a man.’ With which I agree, up to a point. Indeed, if an incel doesn’t lift iron at least 2 times a week, he isn’t really trying.

But the incel isn’t really saying that life is unfair. The incel is saying: it’s not just unfair, it is made to be unfair.

The difference is important. Take a game of soccer. Real Madrid (good club) versus Roda JC (bad club). Real Madrid wins 16 – 0. The normie says: ‘of course Real Madrid wins, they have the better players!’ But that’s not what the incel is saying. The incel is saying: ‘perhaps, but the referee is constantly whistling in favor of Real Madrid!’

Similarly, the deck is stacked against low status men. Following emancipation, women have free sexual choice, and with great joy use that freedom to completely ignore loser men. The men on the low end of the sexual market are literally invisible to women and the moment they dare say something of it, women sternly put them back in their place.

Such continual rejection hits a man right in his balls. It’s a soul-crushing rejection: you are not man enough for society. And society encourages this behavior. Society says: it is deeply empowering of girls to reject loser incels, also it is deeply disturbing that incels think they are entitled to sex.

Normies, being as egotistical as anyone, have trouble wrapping their minds around this point. In their minds society is an innocent bystander. Nonsense. Society determines male status, and if society lowers male status, the males already on the lower end of the ladder feel it the heaviest. Spandrell argued that this is why Islam is so successful: Islam raises the status of men. The downgrade in status that drives Muslim males to terrorism in the West is the same that drove Alek Minassian to kill pedestrians, that 4 years ago drove Elliot Rodger to kill 6 people.

It used to be more fair, in that the referee whistled equally for Real as for Roda. Used to be so that it was not done for a teenage girl to slut around, used to be so her dad would make her date a decent guy, they’d secretly have sex before marriage, openly have sex after marriage. Christian enforced monogamy meant every guy had a shot at getting a girl.

Not so much anymore. Nowadays the sexual market is a war zone. If you’re not a 6 foot tall obnoxious brute with veiny muscles, a neck tattoo and a feather on your hat you’re already 3 points behind¹. There’s a few winners that take it all, but there’s many more losers that take little or nothing.

Elliot asks: ‘why are women not attracted to me?’ Besides lifting iron and taking care of your appearance, there is one thing that greatly increases your chances to get laid: game. But guys like Elliot and Alek always respond the same to game:

I guess that makes me a very bad person. Why do we seem like very bad people?

The problem is that while incels reject certain parts of modern society, they do not reject fundamental myths of modern society such as the myth that women are virtuous and angelic. Elliot Rodger simultaneously saw women as angels and whores. He couldn’t reconcile those positions because listening to men who know the secrets of women attacked the notion that women are angels and Elliot did not want to let that myth go.

I empathize with that. It is very difficult to get to the heart of women because you need to ignore what almost everyone around you says. Swallowing the red pill is tough, because from a blue pill mindset it so closely resembles a black pill. When I started out with game, though not as an incel, friends and family told me I was just being hateful towards women. Then, when I started having success, these people told me I was only banging easy sluts. Then, when I started dating pretty virgin girls these people said more hateful stuff, although I do not know what they said exactly because by this point I had cut them out of my life.

What I’m saying is, it’s hard to swallow the red pill if everyone around you tells you the red pill is evil. Much, much easier to make society as a whole swallow the red pill, so that pretty girls are no longer considered angels when they bang Jeremy Meeks, so that Alek Minassian would have been set-up with a nice woman from his neighborhood. As was custom for thousands of years.

The wrath of the incels is the entirely predictable consequence of the destruction of patriarchy.



¹ Soccer points of course.


Imagine 2 monkeys in the jungle. A special jungle fruit makes both of them experience a sudden neurogenetic insight: God exists! Skirting the edges of their territory, they run into each other and explain their insight to one another.


Their conversation goes something likes this:

Rafiki the monkey: dude, I just heard the voice of this being I never thought existed! His name is God!

Louie the monkey: Wow dude, totally! I just had the same experience! You know what God told me?

Rafiki: what?

Louie: that I am the king of the jungle.

Rafiki: what?

Louie: that I am the king of the jungle. God said he chose me, I was special, dunno why.

Rafiki: God said I am the king of the jungle! Obviously you are deluded, stupid and wrong.

Louie: No you are stupid, deluded and wrong! Eek Eek AAAAH !


In the end it turned out Rafiki was right, by merit of Louie bleeding profusely out of his neck.

My point is, intellectuals, like all men, are monkeys. The other day I was driving to the gym with my girl, and I was complaining that all intellectuals think the world is coming to an end and all intellectuals are convinced they are the only one to understand it. To which my girlfriend responded: wow, they’re just like you!

She may have had a point. Although contrary to these other intellectuals I am actually correct.

When you think of Rafiki and Louie, do you think they’d ever truly understand one another? I just see 2 screaming monkeys in front of me, raising their arms in an attempt to make the other understand, complete understanding meaning submission. This is what religion comes down to after all.

In response to my previous post, commenter Isaac opted that the downfall of the West is not so much spiritual as much as it is biological. He is correct; God is much more in the genes than he is in the Sunday church. Religion presupposes this: all the old testament prophets have lots of descendants, shitloads of descendants even, and they are all geared towards the genetic proliferation of their followers. Spiritual memes don’t mean a thing unless they translate to biological genes. The only way to get to God is through Gnon.

Jesus did not personally have descendants, but the genetic proliferation of his followers is immense. Both Jews and whites used Jesus to their immense advantage.

So essentially religion is a way of enforcing peace among hominids: cooperation/cooperation equilibrium. But, because religion is such a powerful weapon, and because hominids are such close descendants of monkeys, you never get to a successful religion through consensus. Rafiki and Louie did not pull it off, we won’t pull it off.

So, how do you successfully spread a religion? This is the billion dollar question. Need a prophet suited to handle modernity. Jordan Peterson is not that prophet. His muh induhvidualism shtick is too defined by modernity to stand the test of time. Not to mention his purple pill regarding women.

Jim however is that prophet. The shtick of Jimism is solid. It promises me descendants, status and wealth. It promises peace and hope and prosperity. I like those things.

How would siding with Jim affect your behavior? Let’s go back to our 2 favorite monkeys. Louie, following his recovery, met another monkey, call him Jimbo. Jimbo said: ‘God spoke clearly: I am the lord of the jungle. God told me you must join me. Together we will be stronger.’ Louie, liking the cut of Jimbo’s jib, did exactly that.

A week later Rafiki was found dead in his tree.


Nature boils down to a few simple concepts.

Haters will point out that I oversimplify. The haters are wrong. I am good at saying a lot with few words. Nature indeed boils down to a few simple concepts.

In life, you can either cooperate or defect.

Used to be that defection was the dominant strategy, say in the time when the Roman empire started to crumble. Everybody complained about everybody and in the end nothing got done. Then came Jesus, who told people to be loving and cooperative, and boom: 1800 years later we get the industrial revolution.

Because of Jesus we now find ourselves in a situation where cooperation is the dominant strategy. A normie engages in a ton of cooperation: with the tax collector who wants more and more of his money, with schools who want more and more of his kid’s time, with media who wants him to repeat more and more party lines, with the Zeitgeist of the Collective Spirit of the People’s Progress Towards a New Utopia. Essentially, our normie is cooperating himself into a crumbling Western empire.

Turns out that if everyone blindly cooperates, parasites sprout up like weeds until defection once again becomes the standard.

The point of a post-Christian religion is to once again create conditions for the kind of cooperation that led to the industrial revolution. This necessitates throwing out undead Christianity: you do not blindly cooperate. You cooperate with people that cooperate with you, you defect on people that defect on you. Christianity mixed with Darwinism. God and Gnon meet.

This also means we re-establish spiritual hierarchy, which, like regular hierarchy, is a prerequisite for cooperation. It is this hierarchical cooperation that turns a household into a force to be reckoned with, that allows a group of men to unite as a front against their enemies, that allows a tribe to conquer the world. Remember: Scientology bullied the Cathedral’s tax department into submission.

With a functioning hierarchy, men still gossip, lie and scheme, but they will do so in whispers behind closed doors. In your face they cooperate and contribute to the group’s wellbeing because incentives are thus that contributing to group wellbeing heightens status.

Without a functioning hierarchy, men gossip, lie and scheme, but they do so in your face, and they tell you that you are positively deluded for accusing them of gossiping, lying and scheming. Seeds will not sprout in such ground.

Spiritual dominance is established in the same way any sort of dominance is established: fought for, taken. But the fight is ritualistic. You can’t force spiritual dominance if no one listens, or if you are silenced the ritual is not allowed to happen.

If one of our priests is forbidden from establishing spiritual dominance, that is a sure sign an enemy priest is in better control and has vested interest in preventing you from establishing spiritual dominance..

They defect on you, you defect on them. Let them suffer the consequences of enemy priesthood, among others characterized by the annoying tendency that very little is said with very many words.