Answering Imperial Energy

OK I’ll take the quiz and throw out some answers.

Can USG be restructured? [Sure but it’s a coup-complete problem.]

1: What is your single, most important, goal or goals? [to secure the existence of my people and a future for my children.]

2: Are the goals practically realisable? [yes.]

3: How are these goals to be realised? [by doing what all procreating men before us have done.]

4: How many men do you need? How much money? What materials do you need, how many and how much will it cost? [a männerbund helps a bunch. Enough to take care of self, wife and kids. Money and property. Enough to take care of self, wife and kids.]

5: Who do you proximately and ultimately need to convince/ persuade in order to obtain the goals? [convincing a männerbund helps, but no need to convince or persuade anyone besides your girl, who wants to be convinced anyway. It’s more that you need to know how to be a dancing monkey.] 

6: What obstacles are in the way? What obstacles could exist in the future? [the black pill. Leftist singularity and/or death.]

7: What is plan A? What is plan B? What is plan C? [Plan A: see above. Plan B: kill someone and bang groupies in jail without condom. No plan C.]

8: Who is or who could be the “receiver”? [?]

9: What are the possible ways that the system could be “rebooted”? [Coup.]

10: Is the new design – the New Structure – likely to be permanent? What potential problems could affect the stability and transition of power from the first generation to the second? [No. Stuff like getting the most competent man in power, generational decline, aristocratic decadence.] 

11: If you need to build a “machine” in order to achieve the reboot, how do you turn off this “machine” once a re-structuring has been accomplished? [you can’t, that’s the point. Damn brahmins always want to control all the variables.]

12: How might the machine be corrupted or taken over by actors with goals contrary to the formal purpose? [same manner leftism has always done. Can’t control all the variables.]

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Answering Imperial Energy

  1. Thank you for reading and taking the time to compose those answers.

    “10: Is the new design – the New Structure – likely to be permanent? What potential problems could affect the stability and transition of power from the first generation to the second? [No. Stuff like getting the most competent man in power, generational decline, aristocratic decadence.] ”

    Not sure what you mean. Do you man that putting the most competent man in power is the only thing to be done and can be done and that “generational decline” will happen no matter what? Alternatively, do you mean to say that you reject this entire mode of thinking as pointless because you cannot control “all the variables”?

    “[you can’t, that’s the point. Damn brahmins always want to control all the variables.]”

    Surely a “reset” would mean that the Brahmins are no longer in control?

    “same manner leftism has always done. Can’t control all the variables.]”

    We share some of your skepticism about control etc. As Eisenhower said “plans are useless, but planning is everything.” It is still worthwhile thinking about how the system could adapt, change and maintain itself.

    Leftism gains power and expands due to factors relating to political structure and geopolitical competition and warfare. There is little to nothing that can be done about the latter (long-term), though what can “be done” can be crucial. However, it is possible that a political system or order can maintain itself over a long-term period.

    We tackle some of these questions here and in the next two posts:

    https://imperialenergyblog.wordpress.com/2018/02/15/the-steel-cameralist-manifesto-part-10a-the-steel-reset/

    All the best.

  2. > Do you man that putting the most competent man in power is the only thing to be done and can be done and that “generational decline” will happen no matter what?

    Yes, I think you articulate my -admittedly not 100% crystallized- thoughts well. If we can help Trump become God-Emperor, all the power to it. But there’s no way of guaranteeing quality generation after generation.

    > Alternatively, do you mean to say that you reject this entire mode of thinking as pointless because you cannot control “all the variables”?

    Obsessive control of variables is detrimental to reality prediction. Too much noise. It is in the nature of priests to always fashions themselves as Jafar whispering into the ears of the sultan.

    I don’t judge thinking about The New Structure as pointless, but I think we need to trust warriors to take care of practicalities.

    > Surely a “reset” would mean that the Brahmins are no longer in control?

    Once you establish throne, altar and freehold, Brahmins will be in control of altar, not throne. Can’t reset the throne once you give it away because it’s not yours to reset.

  3. “Obsessive control of variables is detrimental to reality prediction. Too much noise. It is in the nature of priests to always fashions themselves as Jafar whispering into the ears of the sultan.”

    Political predication in the short/medium/long term is hard to impossible so yes. However, how the initial structure, principles, selection of “Essentials” etc is done can make a huge difference as the thing takes off.

    A good exercise is to take the founders and ask: given what we know, if they knew it, what would they do differently?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.