Left vs right II: shitpoasting

So this was supposed to be a blogpost trilogy. And I’m pretty sure I had something for this. I just forgot what. Something something leftist scum something. Whatever. All my good memes are in the first post of the series.  Best Of The Week material if you ask me, if only there were such an award to be handed out by the internet! Unlike this post, which will be improvised shitpoasting.

I have found that leftists cheat at games. Literally. Try play a board game with friends. Watch the leftist among them cheat. It’s DNA baby.

The guy behind r/K-selection theory, Anonymous Conservative, impresses me with his writing quantity. 2-3 posts a day! I read his book a while ago. Enjoyed it. I am also convinced that leftism and rightism are genetic and can be traced neurologically. I am however less convinced that r/K theory explains it all. Too many holes in the theory as it is. My main issue is leftists are supposedly like rabbits so they have lots of children – but they don’t, they substitute kids with cats. In fact per stereotype K-selected Christian families are having lots of children. Nigerians are having lots of kids, but if r-selection is adaption to abundance of resources how come Nigerians in scarce-resource Africa are not K-selected like the lions with which they share their continent? I dunno, the comparison wrings on a couple of levels. For the moment it works better as a fable.

 
Why lions eat rabbits

Once upon a time a strong lion lived with his family on the countryside. The lion took good care of the land, so his cubs were healthy and well-fed. One day a family of rabbits moved in next door. The friendly lion went to greet father rabbit and said to him: ‘you seem friendly, but how do I know you will not steal the food of my land?’ The rabbit reassured him: ‘oh powerful lion, you are so much stronger than I am, how could I dare steal your food?’ The lion was satisfied.

Yet as time passed food started disappearing. The lion went to the rabbit and said: ‘are you stealing my food?’ ‘of course not!’ replied the rabbit. ‘There is however a fox roaming the countryside. Perhaps he stole your food!’ The lion, feeling bad for blaming the rabbit, apologised and left.

But more and more food disappeared from the land. The lion’s cubs grew ill. The lion, seeing the rabbit’s family had grown explosively, angrily went back to the rabbit and said to him: ‘my children are weak with hunger. I have never seen this fox you talk about, yet I have seen the full bellies of your children.’ The rabbit was shocked to hear of the lion’s misfortune and doubled down on his claim that this dirty fox is the culprit. He showed the lion a red herring with bitemarks — ‘these bitemarks belong to the fox!’ said the rabbit. The lion, not knowing how to deal with this piece of ‘evidence’, told the rabbit to leave his land alone.

But the food shortage continued and one day one of the lion’s cubs died. This was the final straw that broke the lion’s back; he rushed to the rabbit’s hole, only to find that all the rabbits had fled.

And that is why lions eat rabbits.

The cape and the matador

Coldplay has a new song out. It is a pro-immigration song.

I like the song. Reminds me of old Coldplay. Clip is also pretty.

Of course Chris Martin has completely lost whatever shred of dignity he probably never had; can you sing ‘Sell-Out Traitor Lowlife’ with me? Chris Martin is British so he is aware of the shitstorm that is England. But no doubt Chris lives in America in a big mansion with a beautiful wall around it and the money he makes with pro-immigration music allows him to upgrade his wall should the need ever mysteriously arise. In short: his vapid signalling towards his 90% female fanbase goes unpunished, actually rewards him.

Which does not excuse the scumminess of it all. We all know why the above song is so appealing to females: every single girl dreams of her own rapefugee. The better dressed-up the fantasy, the easier she can indulge in it. Chris Martin obliges by dressing up the fantasy in a family-friendly fable of young men escaping evil worms.

Nietzsche talked about the need to respect your enemies. I respect this song because it is  the only Coldplay song post-A Rush of Blood to the Head that is worth listening to more than once. However, Jim talks about distinguishing between the matador and the cape. Coldplay is the cape, not the matador. Coldplay has clearly been steered by the matador into promoting immigration, or more specifically, would never have been as popular had Chris Martin not signalled his willingness to be steered by the matador.

We see the artist cape reflected in its rightist opposite, e.g. Pewdiepie red-pilling millions of viewers on the wage gap myth.

Seems to me Pewdiepie is signalling his willingness to be steered by rightist matadors. Unfortunately very few such matadors in power. Perhaps president Trump can RTWT a Pewdiepie video?

Left vs Right I: etymology

Life is complex, but life is also simple. Dualistic. It seems thinkers of our time have settled on two main terms to describe the divide that splits the modern world: right and left.

Before we get into the theorising let us take a look at the etymology. In their original meanings left and right are instinctive words, yet hard to explain. Your left is simply, on your left. The side of your body where your heart lays. Your right is the opposite side, housing your liver. Left and right are coordinates for navigating your environment, similar to directions on a compass, but more primal.

The origin of the political left and right stems from the French revolution. In 1791 French revolutionaries rewrote the French constitution such that the old legislative body was stripped of its power. In its place came a new body, the Legislative Assembly, in which the revolutionaries enjoyed all the power.

Now, because the Legislative Assembly was brand new, fresh traditions were shaped every other day. On such tradition was the observation that there were two opposing groups in the Assembly: the group on the literal right side favoured a constitutional monarchy, felt things had escalated far enough. The group on the literal left side wanted the king dead, were in favour of more evermore equality and fraternity. Of course the conservatives lost, the Jacobins won and France endured all the lovely perks of having leftists in power.

Screen Shot 2017-07-08 at 12.55.48

So that’s it for origin stories. On to the good stuff. Why is the right/left divide so accurate? Because nature is dualistic. Every organism has 2 choices: to cooperate or to defect. Life in many ways is a never-ending series of prisoner’s dilemmas, a constant choice between working together with others or screwing others over. Eve cooperated with Adam until she defected on him. The choice turns out to be so fundamental to our survival that we’ve come to genetically specialise in one or the other. Rightism is cooperating, leftism is defecting.

Let there be no surprise that leftists categorically deny this label. In their defence, our definition pretty much puts them in a position where we are asking them how long they’ve been beating their wives, so they are in a bad position to defend themselves. But the truth speaks for itself, and the truth shouts that leftists by nature are defectors.

For cuttlefish, there are 2 main mating strategies. The first is to adhere to the mating ritual, which fighting other males for dominance (co-op/co-op). The strongest male gets to mate. This is good for the species, not so much for the weaker male. So many males employ an alternative mating strategy: pose as a female and sneak past the strong males (co-op/defect). If the bluff is successful, the weak male mates. Bad for the species, good for the weak male.

This in a nutshell is leftism vs rightism. The rightist wants to co-operate because he knows he is strong and he has the most to gain with all-around honesty (it is probably correct that the rightist does not care about what is good for civilisation either, that any boon to civilisation is merely a side-effect of his personal preference to play it straight). The leftist wants to defect because he knows he is outmatched in straightforward co-operation. The rightist builds the system, the leftist games the system.

Trump has the frame

Communicating in memes is cool. Powerful people communicating in powerful memes is the coolest.

Leftists bash Trump for tweeting about the media when he is supposed to do important stuff. But tweeting about the media is important stuff. People need meaning, the media gives meaning by showing us what movie we’re watching. Right now their movie is called: Kill All White Males.

Frame is all, but the frame giveth, the frame taketh. Without an external means of shutting down the media the only way to beat the media is to steal their frame. Out-alfa the alpha; show everyone who is boss.

And Trump is showing the media who is boss. He has the numbers to back him up; CNN ratings keep going down, Trump’s twitter keeps going up. Trump is changing the movie we’re watching. It is now titled: #MAGA.

The below clip reaffirms the point. See how easily Bossert outframes the journalist:

TrumpenTrooper: “President Trump is so genuine.”
Journalist woman: “Some journalists had to get private security guards, is that fair?”
TrumpenTrooper: “President Trump isn’t just genuine, he also brilliantly bypasses cable networks through social media.”

In the old movie, the journalist in an obnoxiously concerned tone demands Trump be outranked by the media which in turn is outranked by the progressive elite which plans to Kill All White Males. In the new movie, no one takes the journalist seriously. MAGA!

On the Death of Pim Fortuyn

I remember where I was when the murder of Pim Fortuyn happened (at a friend’s place).

Fortuyn’s killer was Volkert van der Graaf, a white leftist, whose motivation for the murder was that he ‘wanted to protect the weak in the Netherlands’. Back then this was a surprise — not a brown but a white killer? In retrospect it all makes perfect sense of course.

Hardcore leftists are psychopathic status maximisers. By killing Fortuyn Volkert traded 12 years in Dutch prison for Godlike status among his leftist peers (he has been out of prison since 2014). Sure, there’s people who hate his guts, but no doubt he enjoys great prestige in his preferred social circles. Plus chicks dig a killer. Volkert pulled off a great trade.

Now the question remains: were higher powers aware of Volkert’s plan to kill Fortuyn? Theo van Gogh seemed to think so. In his movie 06/05 he suggests that the AIVD, the Dutch secret service, had infiltrated Volkert’s activist group the Environment Offence. In the movie a journalist uncovers that powerful people plotted to get rid of Pim Fortuyn and secretly assisted Volkert by keeping the police away on the day of the murder. Their motivation? According to van Gogh, approval of the Lockheed Martin Joint Strike Fighter program for which the Netherlands was set to invest 1 billion euros. Fortuyn opposed the program, and for this the deep state allowed or perhaps even instigated Volkert to off Fortuyn.

So what’s my take on this? I think it is mainly a question of competency. It is clear Fortuyn was a splinter in the foot of the American/European deep state and not just because of the JSF program. That the deep state wanted to get rid of Fortuyn seems obvious. But how involved were they in his actual murder? It is impossible to say exactly, but my assessment is that Theo van Gogh was onto something. The Dutch are generally competent and the AIVD is more than equally competent. Consider: the AIVD has so far managed to prevent all terrorist attacks in the Netherlands from happening, except for the public murder of Pim Fortuyn in 2002 and Theo van Gogh in 2004. So yes, I judge it more likely than not that the deep state was at some level aware of the danger Pim Fortuyn was in and chose not to interfere while the public media continued to promote his assassination.

In the aftermath of Fortuyn’s death the LPF received a whopping 17% of the vote, an unsurpassed record for a new party. But it did not matter – the party crumbled. To replace Fortuyn the formerly unknown Matt Herben was pushed forward as leader, who completely crashed the party into the ground, although not before voting in favour of the JSF program. And, get this, Herben became a lobbyist for the JSF program after his LPF career ended.

LPF’s last shred of dignity was destroyed when prominent LPF member Hilbrand Nawijn recorded a hilariously crappy music video starring himself:

Thus ended the legacy of Pim Fortuyn: with a fat guy using him and a Dutch dance hype for attention. Sad.

Europe, the Dying

H/t GeenStijl, the Dutch Alt-Lite media outlet.

Anyone I should know? Calling dr. Spandrell…

Douglas Murray seems to be selling purple pill European realism. Like, he sees what we’re seeing, but he processes it in a way that minimises status damage. Which is why he appears on a semi-popular talkshow. Like Jordan Peterson.

It seems the genie is getting out of the bottle. I might misremember that the decline of the Roman empire was little commented upon, but the decline of the West will at least over-extensively be documented.

The interesting thing of unmasking the cathedral like it were a Scooby Doo monster is that we know its limitations. It is the institutions, the EU and the American Democratic Party. It is mortal and it will die, if only by the nature of leftist singularity. Now that society at large is learning this dank meme; ‘Europe, the Dying’, what will happen to the cathedral? Will it die? Reinvent itself? It seems the cabal of the empire is past its prime, although that might be a dangerous thing to say while it is still the strongest cabal.

On The Life of Pim Fortuyn

Commenter ia recently directed my attention towards Theo van Gogh’s movie ’05/06′ on the murder of Pim Fortuyn, the infamous Dutch politician. But before we delve into Pim’s death, let’s discuss his life.

Screen Shot 2017-06-25 at 20.01.08

For those unfamiliar with Pim Fortuyn: he was a gay politician who was headed for prime ministership of the Netherlands. I can not overstate his quirky brilliance. For one, Fortuyn was an actual rightist politician who addressed issues of immigration, Islam and cultural destruction… In 2002! We are talking 4 years before Wilders even founded his party! For another, Fortuyn had incredible charisma. Think a more mature Milo who was determined to be minister-president. Like Milo, Fortuyn was openly gay which naturally irked leftists to no end. Wherever Pim went, he turned heads. He had this idiosyncratic debating style which simply grabbed your attention. Great cadence. Also great zingers. Like, he’d tell a woman to ‘just do some cooking instead’ and get away with it. On the topic of immigration and Islam I believe the following monologue by Pim will be well appreciated:

I will not change my opinion, dear people, it is 5 minutes before twelve. Not just here in Holland. but in the whole of Europe. And is that what you want? I take my stand for this country, that which has been build up in the last five or six centuries. Damn it, we have a fifth column… Okay, let me tell you now straight the way it is! A fifth column of people who want to destroy this country! I will not go for that, and I say, “you can stay here, but you must adapt.” I must hear “Allah is great”, that I am a “dirty pig”… you are a “Christian dog”. That is what they say, and you think that is okay… And I have so far been very reserved. I have never repeated that… but you accept being walked over, and I will not let that happen anymore. And that’s where I get all those seats from (in the polls). Because this country is fed up! … C’est ça! That is what I stand for. And if I must express that otherwise, well, fine… but it is about your children, your grandchildren. For what else is this about? Must I explain more here? I can not do it any other way, and will not do it any other way. Then I would rather be finished off. Okay, fine… but the problem sir, will remain. That will remain. People have had more than enough of it. Damn it, in my city, Moroccan boys, Turkish boys… who do not rob the Turks, the Moroccans, but rob you and me and little old ladies. And the police? What they do? Damn it… nothing. They tell you: “If you say that, you discriminate”. And that is what I express from the Dutch people. And I stand for it, I stand for it. Is that not allowed? Okay, I respect that. C’est ça!

2002!

For fans of Isaac Asimov’s the Foundation: Fortuyn was an absolute mule, an anomaly in the system. Here we were in throes of the EU, globalisation and further opening of the borders, and suddenly this -popular!- politician shows up and goes against it all. Of course he was demonised by the media and the political establishment, who pretty much called him everything they call Trump nowadays (‘racist’ and ‘extreme-right’ were favorites). He addressed his demonisation just 2 months before his death: “If something happens to me, they are responsible. They may not have literally pulled the trigger, but they created this climate. This demonisation has to stop!’

Then, shortly before the elections, Pim Fortuyn was shot to death by a leftist…

Rick and Morty

The hippest thing leftists have going for them right now is Rick & Morty. Rick and Morty is a science-fiction cartoon about a mad professor, Rick, and his grandson Morty travelling through multiverses. If you don’t believe me, watch it. It’s good.

The characters are good (Rick is a cool asshole, Morty is endearing, Jerry is a spot-on boomer), the story is good and the whole show oozes creativity. So respect for that. Free quality entertainment!

But of course we’ve come to learn that there is no such thing as a free meal. Life chooses sides; no light without darkness. Rick & Morty’s creators have also chosen a side, or more likely were granted a spotlight because they had always chosen a side; the leftist side.

There are many hints in the show that its creators Justin Roiland and Dan Harmon are leftists. The biggest one; both Stephen Colbert and John Oliver make a guest appearance.

Can’t signal your leftism better than that. Imagine if a cartoon included a cameo by Alex Jones.

Rick & Morty has that similar aggressive nihilistic view that Game of Thrones has — it purports that there is no God or if there is He hates you, that life is senseless and without meaning yet that that is where the true freedom lies. Do whatever you want kids, it’s not like it matters anyhow.

^ that video sums up the Rick and Morty philosophy perfectly. The best part is at 2:27 onwards: ‘knowing the truth, which is that nothing matters can actually save you.’ Harmon truly is an honest-to-atheist-God-progressive and contrary to the complete lack of political leftism’s credibility, his artsy leftism sounds cool. Which is the whole purpose of leftism.

My point to all of this is to say that, contrary to what many fanboys of the show think, Rick & Morty has no greater insight into the riddle that is life. Rick is not some genius know-it-all — his genius is constricted by limits of his creators’ imagination. When Roiland and Harmon venture into unchartered territory they do not magically receive instructions on what a non-existent time-travelling genius mad professor would say. The creator forms the character, not the other way around.

So, for instance, when in the first episode of season 3 we review Rick’s memory of 9/11, we should not in the least be surprised when Rick’s response was as follows:

Surprise, Rick thinks 9/11 was a conspiracy by the Bush government to take away our freedom! Cool leftist meme bro. Rick could’ve just as easily said ‘that is something huh, Muslims gonna Muslim, am I right or whaaat.’ But he will never say anything of the sort, because it goes against his creator’s leftist beliefs.

But hey, let’s not lose our heads. After all, it’s just a cartoon show, right?

State media crisis

CNN is lying to our faces.

BBC is lying to our faces.

And so is the Dutch media. The Netherlands is a little like a snowball in hell: keeping it cool and acting like nothing is happening while the world around it is burning. The rumblings at the horizon grow louder.

Screen Shot 2017-06-16 at 09.47.45
Netherlands, yesterday.

A lot of Dutch media are state sponsored, sponsorship by the taxpayer, which adds up to 550 million euros a year.

The NOS is the official state department news outlet. Contrary to the US the Dutch place relatively high trust in the NOS, similarly to how the Dutch place relatively high trust in the Dutch government. But as the snowball melts, trust declines, especially among the younger generations.

You can decipher the interests of the elite by looking at what they lie about. What are they covering up? Besides the usual religious-progressive nonsense there are 2 main themes of lies:

  1. Trump is a Russia puppet
Screen Shot 2017-06-15 at 11.36.53
‘Sessions denies Russia-contact, Trump says he is ‘happy with Sessions’ memory loss’.

That would be quite stupid of Trump to say. And Trump never said that. The NOS literally copied fake news from a fake Trump twitter account:

Screen Shot 2017-06-15 at 11.39.45

The NOS pulls this stuff all the time. Sometimes it issues a small apology if pressed, mostly it does not.

2. Islam is a religion of peace
It has to be said that the NOS is not as flagrantly pro-ISIS as more outspoken leftist outlets such as NRC:

Screen Shot 2017-06-16 at 10.31.48
“A Good Muslim does not choose the West but IS as enemy”

But the NOS is not far behind. A favorite strategy of the NOS is to lie by omission. Simply refuse to mention the glaringly obvious regarding the immigration crisis: that young Arabic men are screaming for infidel blood and white pussy. See below article for instance, titled ‘German policewoman is fed up: I am being called a police whore’

Screen Shot 2017-06-16 at 10.29.32

According to the article, in Germany ‘crime is on the rise’, there are now ‘no-go areas in Germany‘ and police officers experience ‘a lack of respect in the streets’. So strange! How could this possibly be! Who is doing this? This central clue is not revealed until paragraph 6, where the I-word is finally dropped: most problem are caused by ‘men with roots in Islamic countries’. No way!

Clearly the NOS was so ashamed by this admission that it immediately compensated by spending the other half of the article interviewing successful rapper Gelin Veysel, who explains that the police has itself to blame by ‘treating everyone like me as a criminal’. Islam is not mentioned again. Clearly a fair and balanced article.

Screen Shot 2017-06-16 at 13.45.58

If the NRC are prog journalists who proudly display their ignorance, the NOS are cucks who, while standing up to their shoulders in lies and crap, pat themselves on the back for mentioning Islam at least once. Useless.

You can only pretend Muslim men are not screaming for infidel blood and white pussy for so long, for eventually you will hear them outside your home, screaming for your blood and your daughter’s pussy.

From Socrates to Jesus to Nietzsche to Jim

I do like that title.

Western philosophy pretty much peaked with Socrates. Aristotle was nice with his classifications, Plato was okay with his cave riddle but Socrates nailed it: the only thing we know is that there is stuff we don’t know. Beyond that Socrates seems to have just gotten on with his life,; speaking truth to power and paying the price for it. Socrates’ life shows the veracity of his philosophy.

But Socrates did not catch on in Greece. He was too high-brow.

Western religion pretty much peaked with Jesus. Damn man, that guy man, Jesus… King of the Jews, huh. What year are we living in again? Year X after you-know-who, amirite? Jesus knew how to occupy the West for a millenium or 2.

But Christians see their churches empty. The faith is dying. An event Nietzsche predicted over a hundred years ago: God is dead. Hail übermensch! But is God really dead, or is it Jesus who is dead, and with Jesus our connection to God? That remains to be seen. (although Socrates is raising his hand)

But like Socrates, Nietzsche did not catch on. He demanded too much. I have to transcend myself? That sounds like a lot of work. I dunno man. I work to live, I don’t live to work.

Maybe that’s why Jim is an old, fat and bald man. It is a nice counterpoint.

Will Jim catch on?

Screen Shot 2017-06-13 at 23.47.16
Socrates has something to say